Porsche Cayenne III
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed286 km/h178 mph
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lightest2,175 kg4,795 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t189 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions272 g/km
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Most powerful565 hp421 kW
- Best estimated range796 km495 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 565hp421kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 2,598kg5,728lb |
| Gross weight | 2,935kg6,471lb | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.1s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s Calculated | 20.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 756km470mi Calculated | 796km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,926mm194in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | - | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | - | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,680L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | 272g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 5,750-6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 20.9 s |
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 756 km 470 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 796 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 565 hp 421 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 565 hp 421 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 286 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb | 2,598 kg 5,728 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 756 km 470 mi | 796 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 272 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 189 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 423 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























