Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne III

Turbo 4.0 V8

550 hp3996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

5.0 V8

565 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    286 km/h
    178 mph
  • Highest torque
    770 Nm
    568 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,175 kg
    4,795 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    189 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    272 g/km
  • Best overall score
    87/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
550hp410kW
565hp421kW
Torque
770Nm568lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,175kg4,795lb
2,598kg5,728lb
Gross weight
2,935kg6,471lb
3,200kg7,055lb
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.1s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph
Calculated
82.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
12.8s
Calculated
20.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.0s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton
Calculated
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
756km470mi
Calculated
796km495mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,996cc244cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,926mm194in
5,200mm205in
Width
1,983mm78in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,868mm74in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
3,120mm123in
Front track-
1,693mm67in
Rear track-
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance-
297mm12in
Trunk volume
745L
-
Max trunk volume
1,680L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
90L
104L
CO2 emissions
272g/km
298g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V85,750-6,000 rpm1,960-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.8 s
20.9 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.0 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
194 km/h
121 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
565 hp
421 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
2,598 kg
5,728 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
286 km/h
178 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 has more power, Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
756 km
470 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
796 km
495 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.1 s
286 km/h
178 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
565 hp
421 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,926 mm
193.9 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
565 hp
421 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
4.1 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIITurbo 4.0 V8Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20175.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
565 hp
421 kW
Torque
770 Nm
568 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
5.5 s
Top speed
286 km/h
178 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
2,598 kg
5,728 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
13.1 L/100 km
18.0 mpg US
21.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,926 mm
193.9 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
Range score
756 km
470 mi
796 km
495 mi
CO2 score
272 g/km
298 g/km
Trunk score
745 L
26.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
189 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km22.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi36.89 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,439 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 423 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 5.0 V8

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8
Land Rover Range Rover IV 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Porsche Cayenne III Turbo 4.0 V8 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster