Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0vsJaguar F-Pace 30t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
30t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,813 kg3,997 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Jaguar F-Pace 30t
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions175 g/km
- Best estimated range1,065 km662 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | JaguarF-Pace30t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,813kg3,997lb | 1,831kg4,037lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 808km502mi Calculated | 1,065km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | - | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 215mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 673L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 30t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | JaguarF-Pace30t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 6.0 s |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 30t: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 808 km 502 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 1,065 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace30t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace30t |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace30t | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarP 300 2.0 | JaguarF-Pace30t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,813 kg 3,997 lb | 1,831 kg 4,037 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 808 km 502 mi | 1,065 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0 | Jaguar F-Pace 30t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar P 300 2.0
- Is 18 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 30t
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 257 km (160 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























