Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    163 g/km
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace2.0tLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
86.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
36.8s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
887km551mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,746mm187in
4,371mm172in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,667mm66in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
70L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace2.0tLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.8 s
42.4 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 10 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
217 km/h
135 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
887 km
551 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
217 km/h
135 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
6.8 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace2.0tLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
887 km
551 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 2.0tLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster