Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,810 kg3,990 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best estimated range1,034 km643 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,902kg4,193lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.6s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 779km484mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.6 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 779 km 484 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.2 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 779 km 484 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 255 km (159 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























