Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,810 kg3,990 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Best estimated range1,183 km735 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,051kg4,522lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,183km735mi Calculated | 1,034km643mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,220 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has 5 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 7.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 7.2 s |
Although Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 1,183 km 735 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,034 km 643 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.2 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5 | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,051 kg 4,522 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,183 km 735 mi | 1,034 km 643 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 149 km (92 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 241 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























