Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2016-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,034 km
    643 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,810kg3,990lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
-
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
67.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
27.9s
Calculated
40.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
1,034km643mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
4,746mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,667mm66in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
615L
650L
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.9 s
40.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,810 kg
3,990 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
228 km/h
142 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d7.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,034 km
643 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
7.2 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.2 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
1,034 km
643 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
153 g/km
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Is 90 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0 D240
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0 D5
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0d
Sport 2.0 T
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0d
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster