Car comparison

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6vsWiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar C-X16

3.0 V6

380 hp2995 ccHybridRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2011
VS

Wiesmann GT MF4

4.4 V8

407 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

  • Most powerful
    407 hp
    304 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarC-X163.0 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
380hp283kW
407hp304kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,455kg3,208lb
Gross weight-
1,660kg3,660lb
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
291 km/h
181 mph
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
61.5s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
13.7s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
569km354mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,445mm175in
4,230mm167in
Width
2,048mm81in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,297mm51in
1,190mm47in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,507mm99in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank-
70L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
285g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarC-X163.0 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.7 s
13.8 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
291 km/h
181 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW

Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 has 27 hp more than Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
1,455 kg
3,208 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
300 km/h
186 mph
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
291 km/h
181 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V64.4 s
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V84.6 s

Although Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 has more power, Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: 5.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
4.4 s
300 km/h
186 mph
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW
4.6 s
291 km/h
181 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
4.4 s
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarC-X163.0 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
380 hp
283 kW
407 hp
304 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.6 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
291 km/h
181 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Range score
-
569 km
354 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
285 g/km
Power-to-weight score
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar C-X16 3.0 V6Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 120 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
4.4 V8
4.0 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
3.0 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeS 3.0 V6
4.4 V8
GT3 3.6
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsPorsche911 (997)GT3 3.6
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6
4.4 V8
6.0 i V12 48V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsAston MartinDB9 Coupe6.0 i V12 48V
3.0 V6
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.0 V6
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
4.4 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsMaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V
3.0 V6
E 500 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 V8
4.4 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsMaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
4.4 V8
4.3 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage4.3 i V8 32V
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 vs Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster