Jaguar C-X16
Car comparison
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score88/100
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque515 Nm380 lb-ft
- Best practicality score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 515Nm380lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 630km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,445mm175in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 2,048mm81in | 1,892mm74in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,622mm103in | 2,752mm108in |
| Ground clearance | - | 100mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 330L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8 has 5 hp more than Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 4.4 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8 has more power, Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.4 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarC-X163.0 V6 | JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 630 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 5.0 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























