Car comparison

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar C-X16

3.0 V6

380 hp2995 ccHybridRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2011
VS

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009

R 5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    625 Nm
    461 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    49/100

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarC-X163.0 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
380hp283kW
510hp380kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,753kg3,865lb
Gross weight-
2,145kg4,729lb
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.3s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
59.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
13.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,445mm175in
4,794mm189in
Width
2,048mm81in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,297mm51in
1,322mm52in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,752mm108in
Ground clearance-
100mm4in
Trunk volume-
330L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
71L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarC-X163.0 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.7 s
16.0 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has 130 hp more than Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 130 hp (97 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
1,753 kg
3,865 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
300 km/h
186 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V64.4 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V84.8 s

Although Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 has more power, Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8: 5.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
380 hp
283 kW
4.4 s
300 km/h
186 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.8 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
4.4 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarC-X163.0 V6
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarC-X163.0 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
Power
380 hp
283 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.8 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,445 mm
175.0 in
Height
1,297 mm
51.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
Range score
-
574 km
357 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
238 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar C-X16 3.0 V6Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6

  • Is 153 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.4 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8

  • Has 130 hp more
  • Has 175 Nm more
  • Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.0 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeS 3.0 V6
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6
R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.0 V6
2.5 TFSI plus
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsAUDITT RS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI plus
R 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.0 V6
E 500 V8
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 V8
R 5.0 V8
CL 600 V12
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010CL 600 V12
3.0 V6
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
JaguarC-X163.0 V6vsMaseratiGranTurismo I4.2 i V8 32V
Jaguar C-X16 3.0 V6 vs Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2009 R 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster