Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dvsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score94/100
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,692kg3,730lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | - |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 211 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 1,692 kg 3,730 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 7.2 s |
Although Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 1,231 km 765 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,692 kg 3,730 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 172 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 167 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























