Car comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0tvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017

2.0t

211 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-present
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

200 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    151 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,231 km
    765 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
211hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,692kg3,730lb
1,635kg3,605lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
69.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
24.5s
Calculated
27.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,231km765mi
Calculated
1,088km676mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,810mm189in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track-
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,594mm63in
Trunk volume
500L
540L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
74L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
154g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0tJaguar XF (X260) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t5,500 rpm1,250-3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.5 s
27.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
211 hp
157 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
200 hp
149 kW

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has 11 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
1,692 kg
3,730 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,635 kg
3,605 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
245 km/h
152 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t7.2 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.07.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
1,231 km
765 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,088 km
676 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
211 hp
157 kW
7.2 s
245 km/h
152 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.2 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleInfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tJaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
211 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,692 kg
3,730 lb
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,810 mm
189.4 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,231 km
765 mi
1,088 km
676 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
154 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleInfiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0tJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 143 km (89 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Is 57 kg lighter
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Infiniti Q50 2.0t
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0t
E 250
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 250
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0t
Veloce 2.2 JTD
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.2 JTD
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0t
C 250d
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0t
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0t
2.0 TSI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0t
2.0
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0t
2.0 TFSI
VS
InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0tvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
Infiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0t vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster