Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,635 kg3,605 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,375 km854 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 86.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,088km676mi Calculated | 1,375km854mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | - | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,700L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 20 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,375 km 854 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.8 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,088 km 676 mi | 1,375 km 854 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 287 km (178 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























