Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 D180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
D180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Best estimated range1,143 km710 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.5s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,088km676mi Calculated | 1,143km710mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.5 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 20 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 1,143 km 710 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,088 km 676 mi | 1,143 km 710 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 D180
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























