AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q50 · Facelift 2017
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,231 km765 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,692kg3,730lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 862km536mi Calculated | 1,231km765mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 880L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,250-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 211 hp 157 kW |
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has 21 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 1,692 kg 3,730 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.8 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 7.2 s |
Although Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t has more power, AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 862 km 536 mi |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 1,231 km 765 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | InfinitiQ50Facelift 20172.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,692 kg 3,730 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 862 km 536 mi | 1,231 km 765 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 372 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q50 Facelift 2017 2.0t
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 369 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























