Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score94/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 406 km (252 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























