Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250dvsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
C 250d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 90.7s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 89mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 400L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.7 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 250d
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























