Car comparison

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0TvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hongqi HS7 II

2.0T

252 hp1989 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,950 kg
    4,299 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHongqiHS7 II2.0TMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
252hp188kW
254hp189kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,985kg4,376lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight-
2,516kg5,547lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
105.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
39.4s
Calculated
35.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,094km680mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,989cc121cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,960mm77in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,760mm69in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
2,870mm113in
Front track-
1,640mm65in
Rear track-
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank-
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHongqiHS7 II2.0TMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.4 s
35.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
252 hp
188 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 2 hp more than Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T.

The biggest power difference is between Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
230 km/h
143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T8.5 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
252 hp
188 kW
8.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,760 mm
69.3 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.5 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HongqiHS7 II2.0T
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHongqiHS7 II2.0TMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
252 hp
188 kW
254 hp
189 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Lightness
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,760 mm
69.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
-
1,094 km
680 mi
Trunk score
-
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHongqi HS7 II 2.0TMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T

  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0T
2.0i
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0T
28T
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
2.0T
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0T
45 TDI V6
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
HongqiHS7 II2.0TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Hongqi HS7 II 2.0T vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster