Porsche 968 Cabrio
Car comparison
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16VvsHonda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda S2000 (AP1)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V
- Fastest top speed252 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque305 Nm225 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range841 km523 mi
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 305Nm225lb-ft | 208Nm153lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.9s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.7s Calculated | 23.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 841km523mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,735mm68in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,275mm50in | 1,270mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,450mm57in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 143L |
| Max trunk volume | 510L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 235g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 6,200 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.7 s | 23.5 s |
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 240 hp 179 kW |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 6.5 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V and Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 841 km 523 mi |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 252 km/h 157 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 841 km 523 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 235 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V
- Has 97 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
- Has 82 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























