Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet
Car comparison
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32VvsPorsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 968 Cabrio
3.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque309 Nm228 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range841 km523 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 309Nm228lb-ft | 305Nm225lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 723km449mi Calculated | 841km523mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,405cc208cu in | 2,990cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,320mm170in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,235mm49in | 1,275mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,450mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 510L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 7,200 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 6,200 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 240 hp 179 kW |
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V has 46 hp more than Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V and Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 252 km/h 157 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 6.3 s |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V and Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V and Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 723 km 449 mi |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 841 km 523 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V | Porsche968 Cabrio3.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft | 305 Nm 225 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 723 km 449 mi | 841 km 523 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V | Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Mondial t Cabriolet 3.4 i V8 32V
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Porsche 968 Cabrio 3.0 16V
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























