Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33)
Car comparison
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24VvsHonda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda S2000 (AP1)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score36/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk143 L
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 352Nm260lb-ft | 208Nm153lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 23.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,328mm52in | 1,270mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 143L |
| Max trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 235g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 23.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has 43 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 6.4 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
Although Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V has more power, Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan350Z Roadster (Z33)3.5 i V6 24V | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 235 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 350Z Roadster (Z33) 3.5 i V6 24V
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 144 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Is 365 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























