Honda S2000 (AP1)
Car comparison
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0vsHonda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004 2.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda S2000 (AP1) · Facelift 2004
2.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
- Most powerful242 hp180 kW
- Highest torque221 Nm163 lb-ft
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight194 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 242hp180kW |
| Torque | 208Nm153lb-ft | 221Nm163lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,535kg3,384lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.5s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,157cc132cu in |
| Length | 4,135mm163in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 129mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 143L | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 235g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 8,300 rpm | 7,500 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 7,800 rpm | 6,500-7,500 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.5 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW |
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 has 2 hp more than Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 and Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 6.2 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 6.2 s |
Although Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 has more power, Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 242 hp 180 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaS2000 (AP1)2.0 | HondaS2000 (AP1)Facelift 20042.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 242 hp 180 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 208 Nm 153 lb-ft | 221 Nm 163 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 235 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 143 L 5.1 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0 | Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda S2000 (AP1) 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda S2000 (AP1) Facelift 2004 2.2
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 13 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























