Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsHonda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic X Sedan
1.5 VTEC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,191 km740 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Lightest1,246 kg2,747 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk519 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,246kg2,747lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 65.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 30.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,191km740mi Calculated | 807km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,698mm106in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,557mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 519L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 46L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5,500 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 182 hp 136 kW |
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC has 2 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 1,246 kg 2,747 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.9 s |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 8.1 s |
Although Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,191 km 740 mi |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 807 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | HondaCivic X Sedan1.5 VTEC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,246 kg 2,747 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,191 km 740 mi | 807 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 519 L 18.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d | Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 384 km (239 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda Civic X Sedan 1.5 VTEC
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 414 kg lighter
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 64 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























