Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,191 km740 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 1,191km740mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 60 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,191 km 740 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 1,191 km 740 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 239 km (149 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 76 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























