Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,535 km954 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.0s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,535km954mi Calculated | 1,191km740mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.0 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.0 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,535 km 954 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,191 km 740 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,535 km 954 mi | 1,191 km 740 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 343 km (213 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























