Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,191 km740 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km510mi Calculated | 1,191km740mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 132g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.9 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 820 km 510 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,191 km 740 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 510 mi | 1,191 km 740 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 132 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 371 km (231 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























