Honda Civic Type R (FK2)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0vsHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic Type R (FN2)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range685 km426 mi
- Largest trunk498 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
- Lightest1,267 kg2,793 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 193Nm142lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,382kg3,047lb | 1,267kg2,793lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.5s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | 549km341mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,390mm173in | 4,276mm168in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 1,785mm70in |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 498L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,214L | 1,352L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 7,800 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 201 hp 150 kW |
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 has 109 hp more than Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0: 109 hp (81 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 193 Nm 142 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 685 km 426 mi |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 549 km 341 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.7 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 193 Nm 142 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | 549 km 341 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 498 L 17.6 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 | Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Has 109 hp more
- Has 207 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
- Is 115 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























