Honda Civic Type R (FK8)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0vsHonda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic Type R (FK2)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions170 g/km
- Best estimated range685 km426 mi
- Largest trunk498 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0
- Fastest top speed272 km/h169 mph
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,382kg3,047lb |
| Gross weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | - |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.4s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | 685km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,557mm179in | 4,390mm173in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,466mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,528mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 498L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,214L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 46L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 176g/km | 170g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 5.8 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 5.7 s |
Although Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0 has more power, Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 597 km 371 mi |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 685 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.8 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.7 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 272 km/h 169 mph | 270 km/h 168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | 685 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 176 g/km | 170 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 498 L 17.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0 | Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 88 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























