Honda Civic Type R (FL5)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0vsHonda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic Type R (FK8)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful329 hp245 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight238 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range597 km371 mi
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 329hp245kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.2s Calculated | 18.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 580km361mi Calculated | 597km371mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,996cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,594mm181in | 4,557mm179in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,401mm55in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,734mm108in | 2,699mm106in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,623mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 126mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 420L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,212L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 46L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 176g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,600-4,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.2 s | 18.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 175 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 329 hp 245 kW |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 has 9 hp more than Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 272 km/h 169 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 5.4 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 and Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 580 km 361 mi |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 597 km 371 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 329 hp 245 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.8 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FL5)2.0 | HondaCivic Type R (FK8)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 329 hp 245 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 272 km/h 169 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 580 km 361 mi | 597 km 371 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 176 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0 | Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FL5) 2.0
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda Civic Type R (FK8) 2.0
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























