Honda Civic Type R (FK2)
Car comparison
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0vsAUDI S3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI S3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,382 kg3,047 lb
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk498 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best practicality score74/100
AUDI S3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,382kg3,047lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 60.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 17.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 685km426mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,390mm173in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,401mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,594mm102in | 2,596mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,510mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 498L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,214L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 170g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI S3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5,800-6,500 rpm | 1,850-5,700 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 17.4 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 5.7 s |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 685 km 426 mi |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.7 s | 270 km/h 168 mph |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaCivic Type R (FK2)2.0 | AUDIS3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 270 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 685 km 426 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 170 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 498 L 17.6 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0 | AUDI S3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Civic Type R (FK2) 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 23 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 173 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI S3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























