AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSIvsHonda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic Type R (FN2)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score88/100
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Lightest1,267 kg2,793 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best practicality score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 193Nm142lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,267kg2,793lb |
| Gross weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | 549km341mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,238mm167in | 4,276mm168in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,785mm70in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,530mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | 1,352L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 7,800 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 201 hp 150 kW |
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 has 1 hp more than AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 193 Nm 142 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 6.6 s |
Although Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 has more power, AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 775 km 481 mi |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 549 km 341 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (FN2)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 193 Nm 142 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | 549 km 341 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI | Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Has 87 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 225 km (140 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Honda Civic Type R (FN2) 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























