Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 TvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII

2.0 T

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2001-2003
VS

Holden Commodore (VT)

5.7 i V8 SS

306 hp5665 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2000-2002

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,380 kg
    3,042 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    203 hp/t
    151 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS

  • Most powerful
    306 hp
    228 kW
  • Highest torque
    460 Nm
    339 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 THoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
280hp209kW
306hp228kW
Torque
383Nm282lb-ft
460Nm339lb-ft
Curb weight
1,380kg3,042lb
1,640kg3,616lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
57.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
18.4s
Calculated
24.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb
Calculated
187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton
Calculated
280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
5,665cc346cu in
Length
4,455mm175in
4,964mm195in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,842mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,788mm110in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,587mm62in
Trunk volume-
475L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
75L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 THolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SSPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T: Power / Torque
  • Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T6,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS5,200 rpm4,400 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 THoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.4 s
24.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
280 hp
209 kW
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
306 hp
228 kW

Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 26 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 26 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
460 Nm
339 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
1,640 kg
3,616 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T6.1 s
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS6.9 s

Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
280 hp
209 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
306 hp
228 kW
6.9 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,455 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
306 hp
228 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 THoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS
Power
280 hp
209 kW
306 hp
228 kW
Torque
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
460 Nm
339 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,455 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
-
Trunk score
-
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
203 hp/t
151 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T

  • Is 260 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
5.7 i V8 SS
5.7 i V8
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsHoldenStatesman (VH)5.7 i V8
2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
5.7 i V8 SS
5.7 i V8
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsHoldenCaprice (WH)5.7 i V8
2.0 T
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
5.7 i V8 SS
4.2 V8 40V
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsAUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
5.7 i V8 SS
S 500 V8
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W220)S 500 V8
2.0 T
540i V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsBMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8
5.7 i V8 SS
4.2 V8 40V
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)4.2 V8 40V
2.0 T
4.2 V8
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 TvsAUDIA6 (4B/C5)Facelift 20014.2 V8
5.7 i V8 SS
3.8i V6 SC
VS
HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SSvsHoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VII 2.0 T vs Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS - car comparison - FastVsFaster