AUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) · Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40VvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.5L/100 km12.1mpg US14.5mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 698km434mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,034mm198in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,882mm113in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 525L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 310 hp 231 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW |
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V has 4 hp more than Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS and AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 6.9 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA8 (D2/4D)Facelift 19984.2 V8 40V | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 698 km 434 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A8 (D2/4D) Facelift 1998 4.2 V8 40V
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























