Hennessey Venom F5
Car comparison
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.6 s
- Fastest top speed500 km/h311 mph
- Most powerful1,817 hp1,355 kW
- Highest torque1,617 Nm1,193 lb-ft
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight1,312 hp/t978 kW/t0.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score95/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,817hp1,355kW | 570hp425kW |
| Torque | 1,617Nm1,193lb-ft | 637Nm470lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,385kg3,053lb | 1,752kg3,862lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 500 km/h 311 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 22.6s99% target: 495 km/h / 308 mph Calculated | 39.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.6s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 4.7s | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.5s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 8.4s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 1,312hp/t978kW/t595hp/1000 lb Calculated | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,168Nm/t781lb-ft/ton Calculated | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,555cc400cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | - | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,131mm45in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 8,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,300-5,800 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 4.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 7.8 s | - |
| Top speed | 500 km/h 311 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.3 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.4 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 342 km/h 212 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 1,817 hp 1,355 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW |
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8 has 1,247 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 and Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8: 1,247 hp (930 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 1,617 Nm 1,193 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 500 km/h 311 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 2.6 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 1,312 hp/t 978 kW/t 0.8 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | 1,817 hp 1,355 kW | 2.6 s | 500 km/h 311 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | 570 hp 425 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20163.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,817 hp 1,355 kW | 570 hp 425 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,617 Nm 1,193 lb-ft | 637 Nm 470 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.6 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 500 km/h 311 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | 1,752 kg 3,862 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 1,312 hp/t 978 kW/t 0.8 kg/hp | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8
- Has 1,247 hp more
- Has 980 Nm more
- Is 367 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 185 km/h (115 mph) higher top speed
- Has 987 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 3.8 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























