Car comparison

Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8vsRimac Nevera 120 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hennessey Venom F5

6.6 V8

1817 hp6555 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2020-present
VS

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    500 km/h
    311 mph
  • Lightest
    1,385 kg
    3,053 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    1,312 hp/t
    978 kW/t
    0.8 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.0 s
  • Most powerful
    1,914 hp
    1,427 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHennesseyVenom F56.6 V8RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,817hp1,355kW
1,914hp1,427kW
Torque
1,617Nm1,193lb-ft
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
Curb weight
1,385kg3,053lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
500 km/h
311 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
To 99% top speed
22.6s99% target: 495 km/h / 308 mph
Calculated
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.6s
2.0s
0-200 km/h
4.7s
4.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.5s
Calculated
1.9s
Calculated
Quarter mile
8.4s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
1,312hp/t978kW/t595hp/1000 lb
Calculated
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,168Nm/t781lb-ft/ton
Calculated
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
6,555cc400cu in
-
Length
4,666mm184in
4,750mm187in
Width
1,960mm77in
1,986mm78in
Height
1,131mm45in
1,208mm48in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,745mm108in
Front track
1,574mm62in
-
Rear track
1,584mm62in
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHennesseyVenom F56.6 V8RimacNevera120 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.5 s
1.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.6 s
2.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
4.7 s
4.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
7.8 s
11.1 s
Top speed
500 km/h
311 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.5 s
330 ft
101 m
4.4 s
3.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.0 s
5.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.3 s
7.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.4 s
8.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
342 km/h
212 mph
284 km/h
176 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
1,817 hp
1,355 kW
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 97 hp more than Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 97 hp (72 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
1,617 Nm
1,193 lb-ft
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
500 km/h
311 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V82.6 s
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
1,312 hp/t
978 kW/t
0.8 kg/hp
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
1,817 hp
1,355 kW
2.6 s
500 km/h
311 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8
Power
1,817 hp
1,355 kW
0-100 km/h2.6 s
Top speed
500 km/h
311 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,131 mm
44.5 in
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHennesseyVenom F56.6 V8RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,817 hp
1,355 kW
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
Torque
1,617 Nm
1,193 lb-ft
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.6 s
2.0 s
Top speed
500 km/h
311 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Lightness
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,131 mm
44.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Power-to-weight score
1,312 hp/t
978 kW/t
0.8 kg/hp
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8

  • Is 765 kg lighter
  • Has 88 km/h (55 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 422 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 97 hp more
  • Has 743 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.6 V8
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
6.6 V8
8.0 W16
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
6.6 V8
8.0 W16
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
6.6 V8
4.0 V8
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
120 kWh
90 kWh
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsRimacConcept One90 kWh
6.6 V8
5.0 V8
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsKoenigseggOne:15.0 V8
6.6 V8
4.0 V8
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsMcLaren720S4.0 V8
6.6 V8
3.8 V8
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsMcLaren620R3.8 V8
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
6.6 V8
3.0 V6
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsMaseratiMC203.0 V6
120 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
6.6 V8
65.6 kWh
VS
HennesseyVenom F56.6 V8vsCupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
Hennessey Venom F5 6.6 V8 vs Rimac Nevera 120 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster