Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T5vsFord Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Taurus VII
EcoBoost 245
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,144 km711 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Largest trunk534 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,589kg3,503lb | 1,794kg3,955lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,169kg4,782lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.1s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 66.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,144km711mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,996mm197in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,503mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,949mm116in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 534L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 6.3 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 and Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 1,144 km 711 mi |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T5 | FordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | 1,794 kg 3,955 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,144 km 711 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 534 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5 | Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T5
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 364 km (226 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ford Taurus VII EcoBoost 245
- Has 154 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























