Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostvsRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II)

3.5 V6

241 hp3498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    345 Nm
    254 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,704 kg
    3,757 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.5 L/100 km
    18.8 mpg US
    22.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    204 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    787 km
    489 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
240hp179kW
241hp180kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
1,845kg4,068lb
Gross weight
2,510kg5,534lb
2,545kg5,611lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
109.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
39.8s
Calculated
43.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
787km489mi
Calculated
692km430mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,656mm183in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,728mm68in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,803mm110in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,574mm62in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,556mm61in
Ground clearance
150mm6in
120mm5in
Trunk volume
285L
291L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,860L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
70L
83L
CO2 emissions
204g/km
284g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.8 s
43.0 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has 1 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
1,845 kg
4,068 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
226 km/h
140 mph
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost8.4 s
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V68.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 3.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
787 km
489 mi
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
692 km
430 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.4 s
226 km/h
140 mph
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW
8.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
241 hp
180 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.1 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
Fuel consumption
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in
Range score
787 km
489 mi
692 km
430 mi
CO2 score
204 g/km
284 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoostRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 141 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 80 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
3.5i V6 24V
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace IV3.5i V6 24V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
1.8 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
3.5 V6
1.4 TSI
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 EcoBoost vs Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster