Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026

110 kWh

347 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,876 kg
    4,136 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
240hp179kW
347hp259kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
2,795kg6,162lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
54.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
-
Length
4,796mm189in
5,316mm209in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,988mm78in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,785mm70in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
3,160mm124in
Trunk volume
965L
-
Max trunk volume
2,020L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
63L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
54.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
347 hp
259 kW

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 107 hp more than Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 107 hp (80 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
2,795 kg
6,162 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
347 hp
259 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
240 hp
179 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
2,795 kg
6,162 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
-
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 919 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Has 107 hp more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
XPENG X9 110 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
110 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
110 kWh
220d
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
110 kWh
1.5 TSI ACT
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
110 kWh
220d
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
110 kWh
2.0 TSI
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
110 kWh
220d
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWhvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster