Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026

110 kWh

347 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
220hp164kW
347hp259kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
2,795kg6,162lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
-
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
95.3s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
38.1s
Calculated
54.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
959km596mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,854mm191in
5,316mm209in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,988mm78in
Height
1,746mm69in
1,785mm70in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
3,160mm124in
Front track
1,571mm62in
-
Rear track
1,617mm64in
-
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
955L
-
Max trunk volume
2,430L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.1 s
54.9 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
347 hp
259 kW

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 127 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 127 hp (95 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
2,795 kg
6,162 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
226 km/h
140 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.8 s
226 km/h
140 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
347 hp
259 kW
7.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
220 hp
164 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.7 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
2,795 kg
6,162 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in
Range score
959 km
596 mi
-
Trunk score
955 L
33.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Is 1,080 kg lighter
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Has 127 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
XPENG X9 110 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI vs XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster