Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
110 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score54/100
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,715 kg3,781 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 2,795kg6,162lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.3s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.1s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 959km596mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,746mm69in | 1,785mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,920mm115in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 152mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 955L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,430L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.1 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 127 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 127 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 959 km 596 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 955 L 33.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
- Is 1,080 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Has 127 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























