Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008 B 200 TurbovsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Most powerful203 hp151 kW
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 203hp151kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,661kg3,662lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 108.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.2s Calculated | 46.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,034cc124cu in | - |
| Length | 4,273mm168in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,604mm63in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,778mm109in | - |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 544L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,245L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.2 s | 46.7 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 10 hp (7 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 203 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Is 366 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 259 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 181 km (112 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























