Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008
B 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful203 hp151 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 203hp151kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | - | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 108.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.7s Calculated | 38.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 659km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,273mm168in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,778mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 544L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 2,245L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.7 s | 38.0 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 10 hp more than Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 10 hp (7 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.4 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 659 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 203 hp 151 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 659 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Is 331 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 259 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























