Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018

3.5 V6

300 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    843 km
    524 mi
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240hp179kW
300hp224kW
Torque-
361Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,675kg5,897lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
105.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
94.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
35.8s
Calculated
56.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
619km385mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,945mm195in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,945mm77in
Wheelbase-
3,000mm118in
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume
285L
-
Max trunk volume
2,000L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
70L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.8 s
56.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2,125 kg
4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
619 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
-
361 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
619 km
385 mi
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 464 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 224 km (139 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Toyota Alphard III 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster