Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz B-class (W245) · Facelift 2008
B 200 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best estimated range843 km524 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | - | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,295kg2,855lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 106.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 35.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 843km524mi Calculated | 684km425mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,034cc124cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,273mm168in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,778mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 544L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 2,245L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 35.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 47 hp more than Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 47 hp (35 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.6 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 843 km 524 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 843 km 524 mi | 684 km 425 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 47 hp more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 160 km (99 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz B-class (W245) Facelift 2008 B 200 Turbo
- Is 366 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 259 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























