Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsOmoda 5 1.6 TGDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Omoda 5

1.6 TGDI

186 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI

  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Highest torque
    275 Nm
    203 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    680 km
    423 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostOmoda51.6 TGDI
Power
170hp127kW
186hp139kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
275Nm203lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
206 km/h
128 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
68.2s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
50.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
680km423mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,400mm173in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,830mm72in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,588mm63in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,630mm104in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,550mm61in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,550mm61in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
164mm6in
Trunk volume
456L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,149L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostOmoda 5 1.6 TGDIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
Omoda51.6 TGDI5,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostOmoda51.6 TGDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
50.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
206 km/h
128 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
Omoda51.6 TGDI
186 hp
139 kW

Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI has 16 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
Omoda51.6 TGDI
275 Nm
203 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Omoda51.6 TGDI
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Omoda51.6 TGDI
206 km/h
128 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
Omoda51.6 TGDI7.8 s

Although Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Omoda51.6 TGDI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Omoda51.6 TGDI
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
Omoda51.6 TGDI
680 km
423 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Omoda51.6 TGDI
186 hp
139 kW
7.8 s
206 km/h
128 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Omoda51.6 TGDI
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,588 mm
62.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Omoda51.6 TGDI
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
206 km/h
128 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
Omoda51.6 TGDI
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Omoda51.6 TGDI
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostOmoda51.6 TGDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
275 Nm
203 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
206 km/h
128 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,400 mm
173.2 in
Height
1,588 mm
62.5 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
680 km
423 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostOmoda 5 1.6 TGDI
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 129 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 96 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 27 Nm more
  • Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 TGDI
1.6T
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.6 TGDI
2.0 TSI
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.6 TGDI
GLB 220
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1.6 TGDI
2.0 TSI
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.6 TGDI
GLA 220
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
1.6 TGDI
1.5T
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsChevroletSeeker1.5T
1.6 TGDI
40 TFSI
VS
Omoda51.6 TGDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster