Car comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022

1.6 T-GDI

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2025-2026
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    735 km
    457 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
180hp134kW
170hp127kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
248Nm183lb-ft
Curb weight
1,466kg3,232lb
1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
83.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
40.1s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
735km457mi
Calculated
646km402mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,826mm72in
-
Height
1,495mm59in
1,533mm60in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,573mm62in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
426L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,378L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.1 s
45.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI has 10 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s

Although Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
735 km
457 mi
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
180 hp
134 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
426 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,495 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Range score
735 km
457 mi
646 km
402 mi
Trunk score
426 L
15.0 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia XCeed Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 151 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 30 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia XCeed 1.6 T-GDI
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T-GDI
1.6 T-GDI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
GLB 220
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20251.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
40 TDI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 eTSI
VS
KiaXCeedFacelift 20221.6 T-GDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Kia XCeed · Facelift 2022 1.6 T-GDI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster