Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200vsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)

GLB 200

163 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    9.0 s
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200

  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    163 hp
    122 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    570 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
163hp122kW
155hp116kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,280kg2,822lb
Gross weight
2,085kg4,597lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
84.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.1s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
59.5s
Calculated
62.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.6s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.6s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
188Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
839km521mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,332cc81cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,207mm166in
Width
1,834mm72in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,536mm60in
Wheelbase
2,829mm111in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,605mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
135mm5in
166mm7in
Trunk volume
570L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,805L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
52L
-
CO2 emissions
142g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2005,500 rpm1,620-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.1 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
59.5 s
62.9 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
14.0 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.6 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
163 hp
122 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has 8 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,280 kg
2,822 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
207 km/h
129 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 2009.1 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 has more power, Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
163 hp
122 kW
9.1 s
207 km/h
129 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Power
163 hp
122 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
9.1 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
163 hp
122 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.1 s
9.0 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,536 mm
60.5 in
Range score
839 km
521 mi
-
CO2 score
142 g/km
-
Trunk score
570 L
20.1 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 114 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLB 200
GLB 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
GLB 200
GLB 200+ 85 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200+ 85 kWh
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentor1.5 TSI
GLB 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
GLB 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TDI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
GLB 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
GLB 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
GLB 200
200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200vsLexusUX200
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster