Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43vsFord Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

43

421 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2024-present
VS

Ford Mustang VII

Dark Horse 5.0 V8

453 hp5038 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    453 hp
    338 kW
  • Highest torque
    540 Nm
    398 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,742 kg
    3,840 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    260 hp/t
    194 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    381 L

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Power
421hp314kW
453hp338kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
540Nm398lb-ft
Curb weight
1,775kg3,913lb
1,742kg3,840lb
Gross weight-
2,145kg4,729lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
263 km/h
163 mph
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
14.5s
Calculated
17.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb
Calculated
260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton
Calculated
310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
680km422mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
5,038cc307cu in
Length
4,728mm186in
4,819mm190in
Width
1,929mm76in
1,917mm75in
Height
1,354mm53in
1,403mm55in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,719mm107in
Front track
1,666mm66in
1,595mm63in
Rear track
1,644mm65in
1,643mm65in
Trunk volume
321L
381L
Max trunk volume
675L
-
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: Power / Torque
  • Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)436,750 rpm3,250-5,000 rpm7,000 rpm
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V87,250 rpm5,100 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.5 s
17.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Limited
263 km/h
163 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
421 hp
314 kW
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
453 hp
338 kW

Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 has 32 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
540 Nm
398 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
1,742 kg
3,840 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
263 km/h
163 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)434.6 s
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V85.2 s

Although Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
421 hp
314 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
453 hp
338 kW
5.2 s
263 km/h
163 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
Power
421 hp
314 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,819 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
Power
421 hp
314 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
263 km/h
163 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
4.6 s
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
Power
421 hp
314 kW
453 hp
338 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
295 km/h183 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
263 km/h
163 mph
Lightness
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
1,742 kg
3,840 lb
Fuel consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,819 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
Range score
680 km
422 mi
-
Trunk score
321 L
11.3 cu ft
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
237 hp/t
177 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
260 hp/t
194 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.03 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.01 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,704 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43

  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 33 kg lighter
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

43
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 20174.0 V8
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
GT 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8
43
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
GT/CS 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
43
4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
GT/CS 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
43
AMG GLC 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
43
AMG GLE 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 53
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
4.6 i V8 24V
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang V Convertible4.6 i V8 24V
43
AMG CLE 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43vsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
VS
FordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8vsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 vs Ford Mustang VII Dark Horse 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster