Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
AMG GLC 43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful421 hp314 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight237 hp/t177 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range680 km422 mi
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score79/100
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,535kg5,589lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km422mi Calculated | 608km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,792mm189in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,603mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,888mm114in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,644mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | 545L |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | 1,490L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 6,750 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 680 km 422 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 608 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 422 mi | 608 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) AMG GLC 43
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 224 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























