Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed304 km/h189 mph
- Most powerful462 hp345 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range699 km434 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score82/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 462hp345kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | - |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 699km434mi Calculated | 680km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,546mm179in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,929mm76in |
| Height | 1,288mm51in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 98mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 675L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 216g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 6,750 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.9 s | 14.5 s |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 has 41 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 699 km 434 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 680 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.0 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 462 hp 345 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 699 km 434 mi | 680 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 216 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 18.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,704 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























