Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight298 hp/t223 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score82/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 298hp/t223kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated | 237hp/t177kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 680km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,929mm76in |
| Height | 1,259mm50in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 675L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 6,750 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 14.5 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 has 55 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 691 km 430 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 680 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 680 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 237 hp/t 177 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,704 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 43
- Has 156 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























