Ford Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2020-2021
Car comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWhvsQiantu K50 78.84 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Qiantu K50
78.84 kWh
430 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2018-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful487 hp363 kW
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Largest trunk402 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Lightest1,960 kg4,321 lb
- Best power-to-weight219 hp/t164 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 430hp321kW |
| Torque | 830Nm612lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,273kg5,011lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,717kg5,990lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 46.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.4s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 347Nm/t232lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,743mm187in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,613mm64in | 1,253mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,798mm71in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,791mm71in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 103mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 402L | 65L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.4 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW |
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 57 hp more than Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh | 430 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| QiantuK5078.84 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | QiantuK5078.84 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 430 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | 65 L 2.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 337 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
- Is 313 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Qiantu K50 78.84 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)AMG E 53
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C292)GLE 500
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500 V8
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsBMWM4 (F82)3.0
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
QiantuK5078.84 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM4 (G82)3.0